Whether or not he should
have become Scotland’s monarch in 1566 at the age of one, when his mother Mary
was executed in 1587 his reign was fully legitimised. As a baby he had been
removed from his mother, raised as a Protestant and taught to hate her and the
Catholic Church.
His mother was executed in England when he was just 21 years old and, with Elizabeth I of England still childless at the age of 54, it was becoming increasingly obvious that James VI would eventually become King of England too.
Even before Elizabeth’s
death, James VI was being contacted by English courtiers to ensure a smooth
transition when the time came.
He turned out to be a very
well educated and intellectual monarch, speaking numerous languages and having
views on many theological matters. He authored works on the divinity of kings,
yes he really believed a king was on a higher spiritual plain. He also became
extremely interested in opposing witchcraft.
When
Elizabeth finally expired in 1603, James VI of Scotland was proclaimed James I
of England. Historians usually call him James VI and I because Scotland is the
older of the two kingdoms. Sadly, English historians often seem to take pride in
conveniently forgetting that he was James VI of Scotland first. Many documentary
makers seem to forget that he was ever king of Scotland!
So we finally have a Scots
king of England. Some north of the border will have believed that this was the
natural order of events and it does raise some interesting prospects.
Just imagine what he could
have achieved. He could have made the English wear the kilt, eat haggis and play
the bagpipes. He could have built Wembley stadium in Edinburgh and banned the
game of cricket from ever being played!
But he didn’t do any of
that. What he did do was dreadful for Scotland. He abandoned his people and
moved to England!
All of those wars of
independence, all of those kings who had fought to keep Scotland independent and
then our own king moves to England, effectively giving away our independence to
a greater Britain. From that point on, the Scottish influence within the union
became less and less important. The fact that the English adopted James as their
own added insult to injury, but that is just what they have done with the
Scottish oilfields more recently!
James VI & I took on
extensive projects including setting up the commission to translate the Bible
into English and, rather surprisingly for such a devout man, he also came up
with a foolproof method of identifying witches.
This was quite a simple
procedure which required a tight band of cloth being wound around the suspect’s
head. Then a very sharp knife is worked up under the cloth band and the skin.
The blade is gradually worked around the head until the entire scalp can be
lifted off the skull. Amazingly all the genuine witches confessed before the
process was complete!
Speaking of witches, James
VI influenced William Shakespeare, actually requesting that the bard introduce a
storyline within his “Scottish Play” to show that James VI would one day become
the Scottish King. Hence the invention of Banquo.
During
Macbeth and Banquo’s meeting with the three weird sisters early in the play,
Banquo was told that although he would not be a king himself, he would
nevertheless beget a line of kings who would come after him. These kings were,
of course, the Stewarts and the divine James VI was the culmination of the
witches’ prophecy. Banquo is the only invented character in Shakespeare’s play
because even the witches are mentioned in Holinshed’s supposed “history” of the
time.
After James’ egotistical
fifty-eight year reign of Scotland we finally get his son who became Charles I
of both countries. James VI had reigned through an era of peace in both
countries and although there were inflationary pressures at times, the Jacobean
period was seen as fiscally quite sound with low taxes and general prosperity.
It was hoped that Charles
would continue in this vein, but that was not to be the case.
Charles was also an
advocate of the view that kings were on a higher level than ordinary human
beings and he attempted to capture more control over the running of the country.
This inevitably set him on a collision course with the English Parliament.
Coupled with his ambition
for more power and control, his failure to discourage the acceptance of the
Catholic religion set him against both the Church as well as parliament.
After the English Civil War
it was thought Charles would knuckle under, but this was not to be the case and
eventually, after a failed attempt to forge an alliance with Scotland, the Scots
handed him to the English Parliamentarians. The Scottish Parliament however,
never expected the English to execute their rightful king and no permission for
this was ever granted by the Scots.
How dare the English
execute the king of Scotland?
Once again the English were
running roughshod over their northern neighbour’s wishes. There was, of course,
more to it than that, but in the end analysis that is exactly what the English
did and it was only to get worse!
The main protagonist was
the English Parliamentarian, Oliver Cromwell.
Cromwell had had the king
executed, yet he had sufficient sympathy towards the royal family that he
actually allowed the king’s head to be sewn back onto his body so that they
could grieve over it. At least the executioner had managed the task in a single
strike on this occasion though.
Once Charles I was
beheaded, this English Parliamentarian, Cromwell, tried to rule Scotland from
England.
How
dare he try to rule Scotland? What right had any Englishman to rule north of the
border?
We seemed to be back to the
bad old days of Edward Longshanks. All of the fighting and struggling by Sir
William Wallace, Sir Andrew de Moray and King Robert the Bruce had all been in
vain.
Did James VI appreciate
that this would be the result of his inadvertently traitorous action, or did it
all just creep up upon his family through circumstance?
The Scots hated Oliver
Cromwell, although it must be said that his time in Scotland was actually a time
of peace, prosperity and law and order north of the border, as well as the
south, of course.
Cromwell was also full of
political and religious contradictions. He executed the King yet agonised over
whether to become King himself. He forcefully shut down parliaments yet called
himself a parliamentarian. In fact, in the end analysis, Cromwell was not as
hated in Scotland as he had been in Ireland, despite the fact that the Scots
supported Charles I’s son’s accession to the throne.
Eventually the royal family
were invited back to Britain and Charles II was crowned. We were on the verge of
a new, and even more bloody religious conflict.
A score had to be settled
with Oliver Cromwell first though.
His body was exhumed and,
on the same date that his father was executed, Charles II had Cromwell’s body
hanged in chains. The head was displayed outside Westminster Abbey for more than
twenty years and was only buried relatively recently in 1960 at Cambridge.
![]() |
Toyota Optimo V |